Ebrahimi V Westbourne Galleries

Mr ebrahimi and mr nazar were partners.

Ebrahimi v westbourne galleries. They shared equally in management and profits. In the case of ebrahimi v westbourne galleries ltd the house of lords considered passing off or a winding up order on just and equitable ground under section 222 f of the companies act 1948 which section carried the statute before the introduction of section 122 of the insolvency act 1986. The case was decided in the house of lords. Facts judgment significance see also.

Ebrahimi v westbourne galleries ltd 1973 ac 360. After falling out between the directors mr nazar and his son voted to remove mr ebrahimi as a director and excluded. Mr ebrahimi and mr nazar were partners. The case was decided in the house of lords.

Lord wilberforce the profits from their business went only to the directors and there were restrictions in place to prevent mr ebrahimi from selling his shares. Ebrahimi v westbourne galleries ltd and others on appeal from in re westbourne galleries ltd. Read more about ebrahimi v westbourne galleries ltd. Ebrahimi v westbourne galleries ltd 1973 ac 360 is a united kingdom company law case on the rights of minority shareholders.

The case was decided in the house of lords. Ebrahimi v westbourne galleries ltd 1973 ac 360 is a united kingdom company law case on the rights of minority shareholders. In 1958 they formed a private company carrying on the same business and were appointed its first directors. In ebrahimi v westbourne galleries ltd and others 17 the court held that in cases where this principle is raised individuals had banded together to form a company on the basis of probity good faith and mutual confidence between the individuals.

They decided to incorporate as the business was highly. Mr ebharimi and mr nazar had carried on business in partnership dealing in persian and other carpets. Ebrahimi v westbourne galleries ltd ac 360 is a united kingdom company law case on the rights of minority shareholders. Ebrahimi v westbourne galleries ltd 1973 ac 360 is a united kingdom company law case on the rights of minority shareholders.

Unfair prejudice to minority shareholder a company had operated effectively as a partnership between two and then three directors. They decided to incorporate as the business was highly successful buying and selling expensive rugs.